Steve Richards Offered Editorship of New Statesman

Sam Coates says the Indy's Steve Richards is to be the next editor of the New Statesman. Maybe. Guido understands he was offered the job and has been "thinking about it". He has not however as yet formally accepted the worst job in political journalism - working for Geoffrey Robinson...

Guido Writes for New Statesman

Bet you thought you'd never see that. Don't worry it "was for charidee". Amnesty actually. The article is about the Chinese online campaigner and now political prisoner, Shi Tao, and an email that got him a ten year prison sentence.

Tomorrow Guido will be writing here about the wrongdoings of a New Statesman ex-staff member. Someone who should actually be locked up for political corruption.

Mirror's Maguire Brown-Nosing Into Downing Street

Kevin Maguire fantasises that he will be the Alastair Campbell of the Brown regime. He has Campbell's old job as political editor at the Mirror and certainly sucks up to Gordon enough to make himself a candidate to follow his predecessor's footsteps. Guido saw Maguire at the Milburn / Clarke website launch and wondered if he was actually there reporting or spying. It is also noticeable that of late he has been putting himself about giving "media training" to Labour party candidates and is increasingly seen at regional party events.

As well as practising his Brown-nosing at the Mirror, he is part of the New Statesman / Sith nexus, so it is no surprise that he was one of the few hacks to quote the recent discredited "Opinion Leader" poll. Maguire soothed Brownite nerves in the Mirror last week

the poll that really counted this week may prove to be an Opinion Leader Research survey of senior public figures. Political heavyweight Brown was judged to "believe" what he says by 87 per cent, lightweight Cameron by 59 per cent.

Maguire claims the poll that mattered wasn't either of the two field-tested four-figure population polls from ICM and Communicate research, it was the one organised by Gordon's pollster, Deborah Mattinson, of 100 carefully selected "opinion leaders". Does he really believe what he writes?

If Maguire gets to be Brown's spinmeister don't expect a highbrow moral tone from the man who this week wrote of often dreaming of Margaret Thatcher's death and how "back home on Tyneside at the weekend, I found many a Labour voter eagerly awaiting the day [the] former premier is dead and buried." Strangely yesterday morning on Marr's BBC show he didn't recount his dreams to Carol Thatcher - who was sharing the sofa with him. Now that would have really livened things up.
When not dreaming of Carol's mother's death he calls Cameron "Druggie Dave, the Bambi Killer", which may be fair comment or an indication of the nature of the coming Brown onslaught on the poll favourite. If Brown appoints Maguire it will signal that he intends to fight a dirty, class-based political struggle which appeals to Labour's activists - a style reflected in Kevin's journalism that has helped the Mirror lose 25% of its readers since 1997. Can he do for his party what he has done for his paper?

Is the New Statesman Compromised?

The old New Statesman historically was the discussion journal of the Labour party. Issues and personalities of the left were analysed within its pages and it still has serious journalists holed up at its offices. Yet compare the vitality of the Spectator to that of the Statesman, all shades of conservative and other strands of thought appear in the Speccie. But search for anything critical of Brown in the Statesman and you will find little.

Improved as it has been under Kampfner's editing it still lacks something because the hand of Geoffrey Robinson is suffocating it. He is prone to wandering up to writers post publication and congratulating them with the line "Gordon liked your piece". As if any self respecting serious writer on the left would care.

The whole issue of Robinson's ownership and his total devotion to the Brown cause depresses staff. The embarrassment of being known as the Brownite house magazine with the symbiotic "independent charitable non-partisan think-tank" - which just so happens to have moved offices three times with them in the last ten years (can you guess who?) - makes staff blush.

Guido was filming outside their offices recently when Kampfner came out, "What are you up to?" he asked of us. "We're doing a piece on the Smith Institute, care to comment?" "Oh no", he said and walked off. What kind of state of affairs is it when the editor of the liberal left's house journal won't discuss the question of the independence and integrity of his magazine? It shares offices with a controversial think-tank under investigation by the Charity Commission for dubious practises involving the future leader of the Labour party. Every newspaper in the country is covering the story and the New Statesman ignores the elephant literally in the same room as it. Not a single story about the Smith Institute has appeared in the magazine with which it shares offices. Bizarre.

Nick Cohen, a New Statesman journalist, has a bestselling book out, What's Left? How Liberals Lost Their Way. Guido can't help but wonder if part of the answer can't be found in the silence and timidity of the left's leading journal when it comes to discussing what is going on under its own roof.

UPDATE : Guardian's Greenslade challenges Kampfner, Martin Bright tries a Sith mind trick, "these are not the stories you are looking for, you can go about your business..."