tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8212152.post2359759650847326126..comments2007-08-02T12:02:20.656+01:00Comments on Guy Fawkes' blog of parliamentary plots, rumours and conspiracy: "Oh Fuck, Levy Has Asked Me To Lie For Him"JSnoreply@blogger.comBlogger71125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8212152.post-9717008885362286162007-03-16T17:51:00.000Z2007-03-16T17:51:00.000Z2007-03-16T17:51:00.000ZInteresting point of view. Discusshttp://www.bbc.c...Interesting point of view. Discuss<BR/><BR/>http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/03/alert_to_the_arguments.htmlCarlnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8212152.post-77466822231058986512007-03-13T20:14:00.000Z2007-03-13T20:14:00.000Z2007-03-13T20:14:00.000ZThis is NOT news.If she had said: "I have been ask...This is NOT news.<BR/><BR/>If she had said: "I have been asked to tell the TRUTH".<BR/><BR/>...it would be news..Madasafishhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06109237198481955714noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8212152.post-55927322117588441092007-03-13T19:42:00.000Z2007-03-13T19:42:00.000Z2007-03-13T19:42:00.000Zer... sorry. Blame IE on Windoze Mobile.The questi...er... sorry. Blame IE on Windoze Mobile.<BR/><BR/>The question stands....Francis Walsinghamhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07755271865385759769noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8212152.post-62607357582963139092007-03-13T19:23:00.000Z2007-03-13T19:23:00.000Z2007-03-13T19:23:00.000ZObviously they have. Twice.Obviously they have. Twice.mitchnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8212152.post-67122362098826433712007-03-13T19:06:00.000Z2007-03-13T19:06:00.000Z2007-03-13T19:06:00.000ZHas anyone answered the obvious question in all th...Has anyone answered the obvious question in all this, yet?Francis Walsinghamhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07755271865385759769noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8212152.post-89293856053527104442007-03-13T19:05:00.000Z2007-03-13T19:05:00.000Z2007-03-13T19:05:00.000ZHas anyone answered the obvious question in all th...Has anyone answered the obvious question in all this, yet?Francis Walsinghamhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07755271865385759769noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8212152.post-36069595008473610612007-03-13T17:45:00.000Z2007-03-13T17:45:00.000Z2007-03-13T17:45:00.000ZDanny de Vito.Danny de Vito.cecil b de millenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8212152.post-75493714794856692902007-03-13T17:22:00.000Z2007-03-13T17:22:00.000Z2007-03-13T17:22:00.000ZIf this ever actually gets to court,there is bound...If this ever actually gets to court,there is bound to be a film.<BR/>Who will play Guido?Touchstonenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8212152.post-52671558367177372462007-03-13T15:35:00.000Z2007-03-13T15:35:00.000Z2007-03-13T15:35:00.000ZSo maybe it was an email or draftTimes on lineAn h...So maybe it was an email or draft<BR/><BR/>Times on line<BR/><BR/>An honourable mention<BR/><BR/>Over from California last week was Victor Limongelli, president of Guidance Software, an IT company, whose kit searches and recovers digital information from computer networks. He was meeting law firms such as DLA Piper to pitch the benefits of the system and to explain how useful it could be when doing discovery on IP cases or fraud. Any examples of its effectiveness? Sure were. Mr Limongelli’s software was used by the Metropolitan Police to track down the e-mail at the heart of last week’s cash-for-honours rumpus. Timing is everything.BOF2BSnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8212152.post-69922968879046502932007-03-13T13:44:00.000Z2007-03-13T13:44:00.000Z2007-03-13T13:44:00.000ZWell I hope she didn't lie for him, she'll be toas...Well I hope she didn't lie for him, she'll be toast if she did, Levy & co won't lift a finger to help her.Yak40http://www.blogger.com/profile/02895125007482261530noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8212152.post-56006081908508676172007-03-13T13:31:00.000Z2007-03-13T13:31:00.000Z2007-03-13T13:31:00.000ZObviously 'nick robinson' @ 12:48 isn't him. He d...Obviously 'nick robinson' @ 12:48 isn't him. He didn't say: "and yet, and yet" or: "if, and it's a big if".mitchnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8212152.post-53436023855068817192007-03-13T13:30:00.000Z2007-03-13T13:30:00.000Z2007-03-13T13:30:00.000ZSurely though sleazy Levy has done enough leaking ...Surely though sleazy Levy has done enough leaking to ensure a trial can't be held?<BR/>At least against him.<BR/><BR/>If the Jew has any balls he will hang Bliar in he press though.<BR/>For soneone like Levy the perfect retributiion surely has to be to try preventing Bliar having a lucrative career in the hole known as AmericaBadr Brigade Killernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8212152.post-82630704139121441012007-03-13T13:19:00.000Z2007-03-13T13:19:00.000Z2007-03-13T13:19:00.000ZFrom the Daily Mail website: Mr Justice Wilkie, wh...From the Daily Mail website: <BR/><BR/>Mr Justice Wilkie, who granted the original injunction, said that "there is a substantial element of truth in what the intended BBC broadcast was to say". <BR/><BR/>He added: "There is a document addressed to Jonathan Powell in the course of which she (Ruth Turner) alleges that Lord Levy had asked her to lie for him." <BR/><BR/>I would say that this is a considerably firmer statement than what appears on the BBC website, buried on the politics page.Ryan 2noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8212152.post-4561427395634777202007-03-13T13:05:00.000Z2007-03-13T13:05:00.000Z2007-03-13T13:05:00.000ZRoof & the silver haired Yid, know how Dr Kelly fe...Roof & the silver haired Yid, know how Dr Kelly felt now.<BR/>Thrown to the wolves to protect possibly the most dishonest & mendacious PM in British Parliamentary history.<BR/>Surely at least one of them will fight Tony rather than collapse under the pressure.<BR/>Roofy still has to find job come summertime, so she will be crazy to lie down for the liar/killer/fraudster/ PMHomosexualist Bummernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8212152.post-90570888213973763962007-03-13T12:56:00.000Z2007-03-13T12:56:00.000Z2007-03-13T12:56:00.000ZRuth Turner has a nightmare:hereRuth Turner has a nightmare:<BR/><A HREF="http://www.moneymad.org/RuthTurner.jpg" REL="nofollow">here</A>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8212152.post-91964384980951764412007-03-13T12:48:00.000Z2007-03-13T12:48:00.000Z2007-03-13T12:48:00.000ZI've never risen to the bait before but now I can'...I've never risen to the bait before but now I can't resist. Surely even Guido must have winced before writing that "the Beeb was too frit to broadcast" the cash for honours story when we got it first, were legally prevented stopped from broadcasting it and continued the legal battle until we were able yesterday to reveal even more of what was said in that now famous document. Sorry to spoil a running theme that keeps this site boiling.Nick Robinsonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8212152.post-31797340479948922232007-03-13T11:19:00.000Z2007-03-13T11:19:00.000Z2007-03-13T11:19:00.000ZWhat the fuck is a NuLab staffer doing up at that ...What the fuck is a NuLab staffer doing up at that ungodly hour?<BR/><BR/>Too much Charlie probably...daves spliffnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8212152.post-32044463297922274832007-03-13T10:46:00.000Z2007-03-13T10:46:00.000Z2007-03-13T10:46:00.000ZAnonymong 6.55am:(1) Can't you read Wikipedia? Gui...Anonymong 6.55am:<BR/><BR/>(1) Can't you read Wikipedia? Guido is a man of independant wealth. It's called capitalism.<BR/>(2) What the fuck is a NuLab staffer doing up at that ungodly hour? Can I see a cloud of post-midnight oil from my office window? And was it burnt because of an email that began 'Oh fuck'?<BR/><BR/>Oy vey!Mikeynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8212152.post-13184931063888728142007-03-13T10:35:00.000Z2007-03-13T10:35:00.000Z2007-03-13T10:35:00.000ZGuido, may I suggest you begin with...."You're all...Guido, may I suggest you begin with...."You're all f**ked - Thank you and goodbye"Minekillerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07156501963531339801noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8212152.post-8853772877547370632007-03-13T10:32:00.000Z2007-03-13T10:32:00.000Z2007-03-13T10:32:00.000ZThis is nothing compared to the Mummy Returns 'his...This is nothing compared to the Mummy Returns 'history'(as fawkes would have it) at iraqdossier.com!!!Blairs Bribes Bungs Backhandersnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8212152.post-35515271634418047392007-03-13T10:26:00.000Z2007-03-13T10:26:00.000Z2007-03-13T10:26:00.000ZChannel 4 News last night reported that Miss Turne...Channel 4 News last night reported that Miss Turner was under such stress that her memo began with the words: "Oh f***!" <BR/><BR/>The phrase echoed the language used by the Department of Transport's former permanent secretary Sir Richard Mottram in the run-up to the then Transport Secretary's Stephen Byers' resignation in 2002. <BR/><BR/>The civil servant was famously quoted as telling a colleague: "We're all f*****. I'm f*****. You're f*****. We're all completely f*****."Ghost in the Machinenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8212152.post-36642881450336187802007-03-13T10:14:00.000Z2007-03-13T10:14:00.000Z2007-03-13T10:14:00.000ZThe BBC seems to have got itself confused over the...The BBC seems to have got itself confused over their stock phrase "all involved deny any wrongdoing".<BR/><BR/>Last week it was also saying "no charges have been brought, no charges may ever be brought" but that's been dropped. Does that mean charges are more likely now? Why don't they stop trying to spin anti-clockwise and drop the whole phrase? It was only invented for this case anyway.mitchnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8212152.post-64391560583349436012007-03-13T09:32:00.000Z2007-03-13T09:32:00.000Z2007-03-13T09:32:00.000Z@bruce: "Guido is surely joking. It seems unlikely...@bruce: "Guido is surely joking. It seems unlikely that Ruth Turner would write that quote in a document. <BR/><BR/>You haven't got an exclusive so stop pretending you have."<BR/><BR/>It seems you are wrong on both counts. The Daily Mail today is reporting just such a story in some detail so it seems that Guido scooped the whole of the MSM (although sadly he didn't go into as much detail as the Mail's delicicious story)<BR/><BR/>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=441860&in_page_id=1770Ryannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8212152.post-67119157214777532202007-03-13T09:25:00.000Z2007-03-13T09:25:00.000Z2007-03-13T09:25:00.000ZScratch and Sniff uuummm tasty. Munch Munch Burp 0...Scratch and Sniff uuummm tasty. Munch Munch Burp 0)))Guido's gussetnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8212152.post-10157847469809579822007-03-13T09:21:00.000Z2007-03-13T09:21:00.000Z2007-03-13T09:21:00.000ZI'm still not sure why this document had to be kep...I'm still not sure why this document had to be kept secret. The BBC are reporting:<BR/><BR/>"They (the police) were worried that the individuals could have constructed or co-ordinated a response. "<BR/><BR/>But Turner wrote the document so knows what's in it. If they wanted to co-ordinate a response they already know enough to do so. Why does the document being public make that easier?mitchnoreply@blogger.com