Comments on Guy Fawkes' blog of parliamentary plots, rumours and conspiracy: Killed in Iraq : 100Funerals Attended by Blair : 0...

Thank you for withdrawing your false allegation. ...

2006-02-01T12:17:00.000Z

Thank you for withdrawing your false allegation. Now, what is Guido wrong about?

Which funeral has Blair been to? When did he visit the wounded?

Put up or shut up.

We know he writes, we also know he avoids being pictured with soldiers wounded or in coffins. That wouldn't fit the "message".

I withdraw my mistake of writing "written to" when...

2006-02-01T11:45:00.000Z

I withdraw my mistake of writing "written to" when I meant "visited by".

I note that Guido hasn't the honesty or integrity to admit he was wrong.

Could everyone please stop bandying about the UN a...

2006-02-01T10:39:00.000Z

Could everyone please stop bandying about the UN as if it is a cure for the world's ills. Here is a selection from the 53 countries which made up the UN Human Rights Commission in 2005...

Cuba
China
Sudan
Saudi Arabia
Zimbabwe

So shut up about the bloody UN. This is somewhat ironic, since Saudi Arabia, along with South Africa were two of three coutries to abstain when the 1948 Convention on Human Rights was brought in, with Saudi Arabia remaining one of the worlds biggest criminals in this regard. Trying to argue that dubya and Blair are criminals in this league is actually quite sick.

Yes, Blair should visit the wounded and contact the families. Those men and women are heroes.

Colonel Tim Collins, who has some knowledge of the...

2006-02-01T08:23:00.000Z

Colonel Tim Collins, who has some knowledge of these matters, reckons it would be good for morale, its also the right thing to do.

You haven't yet withdrawn your made up claim of a claim that "Guido has no evidence to support his claim that Blair hasn't written. he just made it up."

why does he have to do it publicly guido, when he'...

2006-02-01T07:16:00.000Z

why does he have to do it publicly guido, when he'd be accused of doing it for cheap publicity by the likes of you?

"the PMOS said that he believed he had."Not a ring...

2006-02-01T00:46:00.000Z

"the PMOS said that he believed he had."

Not a ringing confirmation.

So:

"Killed in Iraq : 100
Funerals Attended by Blair : 0
Wounded Publicly Visited by Blair : 0"

Note amendment.

Funny really, im sure David Cameron would be with ...

2006-01-31T22:27:00.000Z

Funny really, im sure David Cameron would be with Phil on this one.

Guido - read this: http://www.downingstreetsays.or...

2006-01-31T22:08:00.000Z

Guido - read this: http://www.downingstreetsays.org/archives/002225.html

Then if you have proof that the PMOS is a liar post it. Otherwise you owe Tony Blair an apology.

Yes, and the answer is given above: say that he ha...

2006-01-31T22:05:00.000Z

Yes, and the answer is given above: say that he had, he just hadn't told the media.

Anonymous,Where did Guido claim "that Blair hasn't...

2006-01-31T18:21:00.000Z

Anonymous,

Where did Guido claim "that Blair hasn't written"? You just made that up anonymous, didn't you?

It says:

"Killed in Iraq : 100
Funerals Attended by Blair : 0
Wounded Visited by Blair : 0"

Evidence : The PMOS has been asked the question.

Guido has no evidence to support his claim that Bl...

2006-01-31T18:18:00.000Z

Guido has no evidence to support his claim that Blair hasn't written. he just made it up. But then, that is becoming his style.

To be fair, when the Guardian once reported that B...

2006-01-31T15:19:00.000Z

To be fair, when the Guardian once reported that Blair hadn't visted any of the war wounded or talked to any of the families his official spokesman wrote in to say that he had, he just hadn't told the media.

PhilUk & Anonymous,Could you two mongs go elsewher...

2006-01-31T14:37:00.000Z

PhilUk & Anonymous,

Could you two mongs go elsewhere and bore? It's all getting bit heavy and tedious with references to Nuremburg and the UN Charter. Perhaps you two came here by mistake? Shouldn't you be over at ChickYog?

Incidentally all "Anonymous" posts are assumed to come from the same single idiot, so try to use a name, like "War-bore" or summink.

That is all.

yeah because like Nuremburg was justice at work an...

2006-01-31T14:23:00.000Z

yeah because like Nuremburg was justice at work and wasn't in the least bit a show trail where the outcome was preordained.

As well as the various parts of the UN charter tha...

2006-01-31T14:07:00.000Z

As well as the various parts of the UN charter that make an agressive war illegal, there is plenty of case law laid down at the Nuremburg trials that says that you can't invade another country just because you feel like it.

As far as the attitude of the troops themselves is concerned, I do believe that they are voting with their feet. I imagine that under-manning of the armed forces will be a closely guarded secret, but haven't you noticed all the recruiting adverts on TV recently?

What use is it arguing about someone who is inept,...

2006-01-31T14:06:00.000Z

What use is it arguing about someone who is inept, incompetent and morally bankrupt?

"If you recall, prior to the Iraq War, there was s...

2006-01-31T14:05:00.001Z

"If you recall, prior to the Iraq War, there was some fuss as to gaining UN sanction for an invasion..."

Indeed and Bush went on to totally ignore the U.N. when he couldn't have his way.

I supported the removal of Saddam Insane, but I dont support this piss poor situation we now have in Both in Iraq and Afghanistan, I have friends in BOTH countries and there is no exit strategy at all. The Pictures we see on TV are those from places it is safe-ish for the Media to go... the rest of Iraq is in a MUCH worse situation, a situation only made worse by bored American soldiers with too mcuh explosives.

Our Government should not be prosecuted for going to war, that was absolutley just, Sadam HAD to go...

However what we should prosecute the buggers for is the situation we find ourselves in today. Stranded in the Middle East, with no way out for the foreseeable future, and all the time Kaiser Blair is cutting our defence funding.... really fucking nice eh?

The Charter of the United Nations and the UN itsel...

2006-01-31T14:05:00.000Z

The Charter of the United Nations and the UN itself is not sovereign over the actions of any of its members. The very notion that only the UN can sanction or authorise war is a negation of the reality of it's make up. There is no legal requirement for a nation state to act only when the UN tells it it can. If there was then the implication would be that the UN had quasi-statehood which it hasn't.

PhilhukThatcher personally wrote to the deceased f...

2006-01-31T13:55:00.001Z

Philhuk

Thatcher personally wrote to the deceased families of the victims, during the conflict, when the Sheffield went down she had writen to all the families of those dead sailors within 2 weeks. I didn't agree with everything Thatcher did but at least she respected those that did her bidding.
Blairs war is nowhere near as intense as the Falklands, indeed he has visited Iraq but shocker he hasn't visited a field hospital or the casualty recieving ship. No I'm not anti war either I'm pro-war but don't Blair does not have the Charisma or nuance to lead a nation in war.

Philhuk - Article 2, section 3 of the Charter of t...

2006-01-31T13:55:00.000Z

Philhuk - Article 2, section 3 of the Charter of the UN states "All Members shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered."

If you recall, prior to the Iraq War, there was some fuss as to gaining UN sanction for an invasion...

"No, it only requires the British government to be...

2006-01-31T13:37:00.000Z

"No, it only requires the British government to be bound by international treaties not to attack other countries without reasonable cause. The war is illegal under British law, not a hypothetical superstate."

I call. Which treaty forbids Britian (or any nation for that matter) attacking another nation?

p.s. who said anything about a hypotethical superstate?

"i thought they enlisted to do as they were told?"...

2006-01-31T13:33:00.000Z

"i thought they enlisted to do as they were told?"

I think you wil find that recruiting literature appeals to a potential soldier's patriotism, rather than his desire to take orders. Taking orders is just a means to an end, and the end is the defence of Britain.

"In order for the war to have been illegal that implies there exists some sort of sovereign above the crown."

No, it only requires the British government to be bound by international treaties not to attack other countries without reasonable cause. The war is illegal under British law, not a hypothetical superstate.

Pte Narel Sharpe got sent home without any of thos...

2006-01-31T13:28:00.001Z

Pte Narel Sharpe got sent home without any of those things. True he did then proceed to refuse to be mugged on the streets of Smethwick and got himself shot dead, but these are the prices you pay for freedom.

Who is surprised, Blair doesn't care a less. But w...

2006-01-31T13:28:00.000Z

Who is surprised, Blair doesn't care a less. But who is worse, the murderer Blair or the idiots who continue to vote for this liar.

Populations get the leaders they deserve and this celebrity driven idiot culture deserves Blair.

They do indeed 'do as they are told', and after th...

2006-01-31T13:23:00.000Z

They do indeed 'do as they are told', and after they have done as they were told they are either:
1) killed in action
2) accused and prosecuted of war crimes
3) court martialed
4) wounded
5) not sent home