Guy Fawkes' blog of parliamentary plots, rumours and conspiracy: U-Turn : Dithered to the Death
Advertise on this site

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

U-Turn : Dithered to the Death

At PMQs Dave called Gordon "a loser not a leader". The hastily cobbled together deal placated Frank Field this morning and he withdrew his amendment. Apparently the sticking plaster for the lower paid will be backdated and will include "changes to the winter fuel payment system, tax credits and the minimum wage in order to compensate those losing out from the ending of the 10p rate."

Nice and simple. Not.

Cast your mind back to last week's U.S. trip. On the flight to Washington Gordon personally briefed the Lobby on the usual off-the-record basis that "No one will lose out."

He dismissed Lobby hacks claims that dozens of Labour MPs were set to rebel over the issue, saying: "It is just one or two MPs asking questions." The Mail on Sunday was not on the trip, so was not bound by Lobby terms, it accurately reported Gordon claiming
"You're wrong. No one will lose out. Come on . . . you guys have exaggerated it all."

When BBC political editor Nick Robinson insisted there was a sizeable Labour revolt, Mr Brown fired back*: "No it isn't. There are just one or two MPs asking questions."

When a journalist from a Labour-supporting paper insisted that the rebellion was far bigger, Mr Brown scowled: "Really? Really? That's what you say."

He was equally abrupt with ITN political editor Tom Bradby, who had asked him at the White House about the resignation threat by ministerial aide Angela Smith.

Mr Brown was forced to break off from his White House talks to beg Ms Smith not to resign. "You said a Minister was going to resign, but she didn't," Mr Brown told Mr Bradby.

Asked "What did Angela Smith say to you?" Mr Brown replied: "She just phoned me to say she wasn't resigning."

BBC Newsnight political editor Michael Crick asked sarcastically: "She phoned you up at the White House to tell you she wasn't resigning? Do all your Ministers do that?"

Another journalist put Mr Brown on the spot: "Do you acknowledge that there will be some losers from this tax change?"

The Prime Minister replied: "No. It's not as simple as that."

Such was the extraordinary nature of the exchanges with the assembled Lobby that the papers, even though bound by Lobby terms, were full of phrases hinting along the lines of "PM Privately Furious" the next day. Downing Street spin officials were horrified by the disastrous briefing. The PM appeared to be either in complete denial or out of touch with reality. He was also close to losing self-control and on the edge of throwing yet another tantrum. Gordon was convinced by officials he should give another personal briefing during the trip in an attempt to repair the damage done.

Clearly if you start talking transparent bollocks to the Lobby when you are off-the-record, you will inevitably get a bad press. The whole point of the Lobby and off-the-record briefings is that they are supposed to allow candid honesty in return for non-attribution. Gordon's psychological flaws and unwillingness to accept criticism make it impossible for him to accept that when he has made a mistake, and this was a huge mistake, he has to openly make amends. His usual bullying didn't work in this case - he has now made a humiliating U-turn - not an act of leadership.

*Nick Robinson has obliquely confirmed the Mail on Sunday's version of events. He blogs that "Gordon Brown had shouted down those who told him there were many many losers from his last Budget as Chancellor and those who told him he faced a real political crisis as a result." Guido suspects that Nick himself was, as reported, one of "those" shouted down.

UPDATE : U-turn letter (pdf) here.

68 comments:

Blue Eyes said...

Brown now says that the 10p rate wasn't the best way of doing things and that he has a better scheme up his sleeve. If that is true why didn't he announce it in advance and avoid all this kerfuffle?

Is it possibly because he is talking shit?

Cream Horn said...

He could borrow my Tom Tom.

Anonymous said...

Even Boris couldn't have made more of a mess, how the feck do these people get anywhere near, let alone actually in, power?

Anonymous said...

But he hasn't actually done a U turn has he?

He has vaguely promised to do a fudge sometime down the line and a few people who lose out may get something back if they submit the correct claims. Cameron should have hammered this point home. Telling the people that Brown was doing the right by them with his U turn was a TERRIBLE mistake.

Anonymous said...

That U-turn letter is more like an S-bend letter. Would anyone trust any of these skunks?

1971Thistle said...

I work in communications, and is amazing how quickly supportive media pick up the "the line to use (LTU)". there is clearly one to avoid talking about a humiliating u-turn. Clearly it coudl nto be spun away - so the idea is to say if it's popular it doesn't matter - Joe Blow is too stoopid to know

Today's LTU is "voters don't seem to mind about U-turns if they agree with them", used virtually verbatim by Andrew Sparrow in the Grauniad and Nick Robinson on the World at One.

Keep your eyes and ears open for "the line"

Anonymous said...

I see they sat Browne next to Brown today. On leave from rehab?

Anonymous said...

@Anonymous 1:16:

You make a valuable point - these people are totally USELESS. How the hell do they advance to the positions they're in? Politicians not so long ago were serious intellectual heavyweights, this lot are just buffoons.

Anonymous said...

The 10p rate was bad, what New Labour meant to do was say that people should apply to New Labour for a fraction of their money back, so you are wedded to the state for an existence, and so they can control you and your votes.

Honest and proud people don't claim the benefits as it's an insult to them, New Labour scroungers will claim everything. New Labour gets to expand the unaffordable public sector and claim that unemployment is real low.

This is why the benefits bill in the UK is so huge under New Labour.

You are totally wreckless with your money, gay Gordon and New Labour knows how best to spend your money... like on bailing out people with mortgages to the tune of £160bn (and rising).

Brown Nappie said...

Just heard Yvette on Radio Five- what a load of Shite she spoke
never could own up to the U turn
By The Way, did you see the shot of her at PMQ?
The ladette looked knackered-
like some one who had been shagged all night....

Anonymous said...

Typical pro-lab coverage from the Beeb. Three lines detailing his humiliation, thirty lines explaining how it will benefit everyone young and old...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7362283.stm

Anonymous said...

Prime Minister Gordon Brown has said the UK would support proposals for a full arms embargo on Zimbabwe.

More waffle - he dosn't support an embargo - he will suport proposals for an embargo!

Jowell Mortgage Advisory Services said...

Not let me see.

McSnottie introduced the 10p band. Then he secretly doubled it (not "abolished" it). When this doubling was discovered, he said it was a good idea, and nobody lost out. Then he introduces measures to help those who HAVE lost out. But he is right to get rid of this terrible tax band. Even though it was he who introduced it.

And then he accuses Cameron of being "inconsistent".

Tuscan Tony said...

"...at a cost to the Treasury of..."

I think you'll find its a "cost to the taxpayer", me old cockie, not Treasury. Though I suspect you neither appreciate that point, nor particularly care.

Dot Neck said...

Point 6 of Darling's letter refers to the 'hand work' they have put in. Is this another example of Nulab typo sloppiness demonstrating just how hastily this humiliating u-turn was conceived? Or does 'hand work' refer to the fact that they are all just a bunch of w*****s?

simon said...

It's the pure socialism of it that makes me fume. They take money from low earners in tax only to give it back, via huge bureacracy, in benefits. Why not just not take it in the first place? Because that wouldn't keep us beholden to our all-powerful government. I've tried hard to get into the socialist mindset over the years - it doesn't come naturally - and I can only conclude that this type of merry-go-round where everyone is an agent of the government is what they actually want. It's what turns them on politically. There could not be a bigger contrast between this psyche and the conservative ethos of light-touch government. I'm just sitting tight for the next 2 years and hoping Brown doesn't get to enact too many more of his left-wing fantasies on Britan.

Nationalisation of our mortgages and credit card debt is not a good sign.

Anonymous said...

Before you can put in 'hand work' you must presumably have a hand job so by definition they must be w*****s.

Can we look forward to future Nulab initiatives to help hand working families?

George Street said...

Mrs Dale is giving us a fascinating account of his diabetes over on his site. Any chance of an update on your blood sugar levels, Guido?

Anonymous said...

Gordon personally briefed the Lobby on the usual off-the-record basis that "No one will lose out."

According to Martin Kettle, Brown told Blair before the 2007 Budget that 25,000 would lose out from the 10p tax cut.

Brown's satnav said...

Route recalculation
At the next roundabout.. turn slightly right, then slightly more right, then even more slightly right, and then a final slightly more right turn.
Then exit at the fifth turn but continue to insist that you haven't.

Anonymous said...

Did anyone see blinky Balls on the front bench for PMQs?

Or has he picked up Brown's habit of disappearing when things get a bit tough

Anonymous said...

The 10p tax rate was 'transitional'

What a load of bollocks. Where did it say in the Labour Manifesto or during the introduction of the 10p tax rate in 1999 that it was 'transitional'

And why tax the poor more and then make them reclaim the tax via tax credits.

Is this where Gordon Brown is creating jobs by employing more civil servants to hand back with one hand the tax they have taken with the other?

ROBBIE said...

WHERE CAN WE RUN TO?

Bank bailout may weaken British government bonds
Tue, 2008-04-22 02:27. Section: Daily Dispatches

Gilts Market May Be Hit by Bank Bailout

By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
The Telegraph, London
Tuesday, April 22, 2008

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2008/04/22/cngilt...

Goldman Sachs has advised clients to take out "short" positions on British 30-year Gilts before a rash of new issues by the Government floods the bond market.

Crime does pay as I never get anything more than an ASBO said...

O/T but Psst listen up you guys..

For Sale [must be gone quick]
Bank account Card and cheque book.
Mastercard and Visa cards.
Computer cases and two laptops Brown leather wallet
West Ham season ticket
Four tickets for Mamma Mia tonight.

£300 the lot..no questions asked.

call me at Bloomsbury nick.. ask for PC Knackers

billy bremner's ghost said...

What was the abolition of the 10% band and the reduction of the basic to 20% all about?

Brown knew well enough that the poorest would be disadvantaged but he was playing to another audience. Middle England. Why? Because he planned to call an election before the shit hit the fan in April 2008 when his theft from the poor would be discovered.

Osborne and co should have done some homework last year and preempted Field and co. No political capital for Conservatives. Osborne lightweight.

lola said...

I've read the pdf - it's bollocks.

Why is it better, just why, to take money away from peple who've earned it only to pay it back in benefits?

Talk about enslavement to the State.

The man's a deranged dick head.

zeno said...

Cameron is so curiously weak and ineffectual on these occasions.

Being charitable, perhaps he has decided to adopt the traditional defence against attack by tanks: get out of their way, wait until they break down and then pummel them.

Labour is looking broken-down at the moment: when does the Tory attack on them begin?

Anonymous said...

In PMQ's tried to defend the abolition of the 10p tax band by highlighting to his Labour colleagues that 85% of the benefits of the 10p tax band went to basic and higher rate taxpayers.

Pity that Cameron didn't respond by pointing out that he replaced it with a cut in the basic rate of tax where 100% of the benefits went to basic rate and higher rate taxpayers.

Anonymous said...

Gordon is trying to work out why he can't get away with telling bare-faced lies. After all, Blair did it for years, and no-one complained ...

Dave H. said...

'She just phoned to say she wasn't resigning' Lionel Ritchie had one like that This is the just the same, normal spontaneous gesture of loyalty.

Only the prospect of a Commons defeat just before important elections can make Gordo pull his finger out* and admit to a mistake. Is this arrogance or reality-denial on the same scale as the last days in the Führer's bunker. Or both?

*predictable but mandatory bogey-eating reference.

Harry Basset said...

As a simple pooch I don't understand how Darling tinkering with the minimum wage will really help. More money means more tax? Why not adjust the allowances instead? I will now go back in my bed.

Anonymous said...

Wonder why the Labour rebels caved in so quickly on such a wimp letter?

Less to do with the tax change and more to do with factions feeling the support for a leadership challenge?

robbie said...

Could we have a graphologist's opinion of Darling's 'writing' on the U Turn letter.

bofl said...

ISN'T THERE A LAW THAT SAYS THAT PM'S THAT LIE ARE SACKED?
IF NOT WHY NOT?
LET'S get one -PRONTO!
THIS MAN IS EVEN MORE PATHETIC THAN BLAIR.

HE SHOULD BE FORCED TO GO AND GIVE UP HIS SALARY AND PERKS AND LIVE ON £12,000.THEN HE MIGHT FIND OUT WHAT REAL LIFE IS LIKE FOR MANY PEOPLE IN THE UK........
ps sorry for caps.....this turd really makes me angry

Anonymous said...

It is always difficult to understand what this governemnt actually means. I have read the letter and it says nothing that would appease me about the loss of the 10p rate. If you have children you get more tax rebates or child benefits. If old you get the fuel allowance. If you are young you may get an increase in the minimum wage (ie someone other than the government or tax payer pays up. I bet employers will love this).

The 'rebel' labour MP's have been bought off with vague promises. Show us the beef Gordon!

idle said...

Even the Chancellor's secretary is feckless.

There is no Point 1. Whoever drafted the letter mistook the first para's starting letter as a 1 instead of an I.

Hoppo fell out with me because he said I'm a cunt said...

How stupid are these cunts?

Helping the poor?

Read the rules on the Winter Fuel Allowance and you'll realise that it's not just paid to pensioners (i.e. people drawing a pension) or the poor but anyone over 60 who cares to claim it.

So me and my mate from Leeds, both professional men paying 40% tax, driving Mercedes and Bentley cars, mortgage free for decades, assets well sheltered from CGT, 8 kids between us, all privately educated, funded through university, houses bought for them, three foreign holidays a year with full english breakfasts for all the family, will get the payment.

We don't need the money because we haven't fallen into the grip of the usurious money lenders of the once proud but now humbled banking sector, we don't give a shit about another £800 of food bills this year or extra RFL on gas guzzlers because frankly it's petty cash and anyway we're not big fat cunts like Charles Clarke, Brown, Browne, Prescott and Jaquie Smith eating a load of processed shite like the chavs they are by nature rather than upbringing.

The trouble is the payment isn't enough even to buy a pair of Berluti shoes, so we're going to organise a group of like minded people of the same age and socio-economic standing to go on a little trip to Marbella. Easyjet to Malaga (low profil, no ostentation) Plaza Andalucia hotel, all described as a continuing professional education conference, therefore tax deductible.

Boys being boys some will blow the WFA on a trip to the old Milady Palace on the other side of the main road where Gary met and fell in love with Betty from Brazil. He went back the next night but she was busy with the starboard boiler room watch from the USS John C. Stennis. Personally I think it's a bit passe since Fat Freddie got caught. Still the WFA should be enough for a good rimming and blowjob.

For the sensible however it'll be a delicious long seafood lunch in the warm winter sun and a bucketful of the old San Miguels and red Rioja over a good Spanish dinner.

Thank you Mr Darling and Mr Brown, you cunts.

Anonymous said...

Does Brown really talk like that???

Sounds like one of my kids. On second thoughts even my 8 year old gave up that "you said she'd do this but she didn't" kind of nonsense a year back.

Dunfesterin, friend of the English intelligentsia said...

Lying, mendacious, spineless cunts the lot of them!

Are you sure they are not English?

Anonymous said...

The answer is that they are NOT trying to run the country efficiently or well or for the benefit of the people. They are merely trying to stay in power long enough to make sure that there is an irreversible transfer of power to the EU.

I did not believe this, but I do now.

The EU is now so confident they have released a new map (Telegraph - “ On St George's Day, EU wipes England off map”) removing all trace of England and showing the South of the island being in a new EU region together with northern France called Manche. The url is http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?view=DETAILS&grid=A1YourView&xml=/news/2008/04/23/nmap123.xml

All the vast immigration for the last 10 years was not economic, but a deliberate policy to dilute the culture of the awkward English and destroy the national identity.

Brown is NOT stupid as some would have it, but a very dangerous enemy of the English intent on the destruction of England as a nation. They want us parcelled up and impotent within the unaccountable EU Empire.

If there is an election in 2009/2010 and Labour stay in power, I do not think there will be another - at least on the present system. The 2009/2010 election seems likely to be the last chance to stop the Project.

WAKE UP people - it is going so fast.

Anonymous said...

But none of these measures will help me. I have no children, am not old, and while I'm low paid am not on the minimum wage.

These useless bastards are still screwing me and countless others. They're paying SOME money back to SOME people, but many of us won't be getting anything.

Frank Field should hang his head in shame if this is enough to satisfy him. Stuff him, and the rest of his party, I'll be voting tactically against Labour at every single opportunity until these sleazy grabbing slimeballs are in opposition.

Gordon_Who? said...

Why does Alistair Darlings signature on the attached PDF look like Ali G?

Are they the same person?

Anonymous said...

Is Frank Field the real PM? All it takes is a simple amendment and he forces a change in Government policy.


The question that emerges from this, who is really in charge of tax and welfare policy? Gordon Brown or Frank Field?

Anonymous said...

So he will use the minimum wage to make up the gap? That's a novel approach to tax. The Government stiffs you on tax then ups the minimum wage to make your employer pay you more to make up the gap.

Of course that just pushes the higher cost onto all the other poor sods who buy the goods and services you produce and (guess what) the Government then also taxes that increase through

* more tax on you (again)
* more VAT on the higher prices your employer has to charge.

But of course you the poor lowly paid will benefit - until of course you have to buy something because the Government's actions have pushed up prices again so everything costs more and you see no real benefit of the rise.

Who in the Tresaury thought this one up. It must be the Great Helmsman himself!

Anonymous said...

The rebels have stopped rebelling because the public now think they have won. They know that the public will not read Darling's letter and realise that this is NOT the U turn that Cameron claimed. So they can now tell their electorate what a good job they have done, even though they have achieved the square root of Fuck all.

Fucking Cameron has played right into Brown's hands and has told the world that Gordon is a changed man and has given the poor their money back. It is a Fucking shambles. Brown wins, the rebels win, Cameron loses and most importantly the Poor Lose.

Anonymous said...

increasing the minimum wage will case inflation, thus rendering the government's 'prudent' anti - inflation public sector pay policy.

say it goes from £5 to £6 (approx. averages) then thats £1824 more per person per year (38 hr week, 4 week holiday) multiply that by say 3 million (a guestimate) then that is £5,472,000,000 extra per year in wage costs and puts the £xx million wanted by the police in context.

i don't really understand why the 10 % rate was not kept, or abolished & starting rates increased. i also presume that there will be an increase in cash in hand work etc.

Genghiz the Kahn said...

Bet Goron liked being reminded about breaking off from a meeting with Bush to take an important call from a rebellious PPS. Bet Bush won't forget Broon's snub, or slaying of Tony. Great to see that Goron is such a towering strategist that he turns the whole 10% band issue into a macho test of poverty removal, job creation and bureaucratic complexity. Then spin it as being good for Britain, just like working family tax credits. The man is a walking disaster and the more voters see of him, the more they are repelled. There are alternatives to this sub-prime minister's follies, and the voters will be turning to them in bigger numbers next week.

If Goron did humility he might save some NuLab councillors from a well deserved retirement, but instead he remains incapable of owning up to errors of judgement. He doesn't know the meaning of humility but instead masters the arts of evasion, back stabbing with continual and delusional recantations of tractor output.

Wasn't it touching to see Swiss Des looking so well, and sitting at Goron's right hand. Is Twa jobs Des still on leave of absence or did he take a contructive part in today's proceedings. Perhaps he has been turned into another nodding dog, like Straw and Harperson. Nods and says nothing of substance.

Slim Jim said...

This move is obviously the lesser of two evils for Brown. He stood a chance of losing next week's vote, so he caved in to the rebels. Only most people have now 'got it' about this mendacious shower of political pygmies. Brown - you were fucked if you did and fucked if you didn't. The good thing is, this leaves a lot of political capital for the young Cameron and his chums to tease the 'champions of the poor (fuckers)' with. This is another plate left spinning...

Desperate Dan said...

Every time Broon boasts about taking people out of poverty it reminds me of the many more people that he's put into poverty

dickie the sheet metal worker said...

Amid all the fuss about the 10% tax rate there is another much larger tax hike that has gone pretty much unnoticed. I am self-employed, I pay myself minimum wage or thereabouts because that's all the business can afford, and the only perk I have is a ten year old Escort van which I use for personal as well as business use.

In 2006-7 my income tax was £1,546. In the year just ended it has gone up 45% to £2,257. Why? Because of my old shagger of a van. That cocksucking, snot-gobbling, lying, thieving cunt, Gordon Twatface Brown, increased the taxable benefit on private use of company vans from £350 to £3,500.

OK, so it is still cheaper for me to pay the tax than to buy and run a car, but haven't these cunts heard of the concept of phasing in tax increases gradually? Or do they think that only the rich have company vans? (This lot are so fucking detached from reality that anything is possible.) There must be many thousands of self-employed people like myself, struggling to make a living, who are in the same position as me.


About the only bright star in this firmament of shit is that the business pays for the diesel, so fuel price increases don't reduce the amount of money I have to spend...

They just push my business closer to bankruptcy instead.

thick as thieves said...

The Prime Minister of Great Britain
is a pathological liar.
aswell as a FUCKING JONAH!!!!!!
we've got the worst of both worlds with this loser.

AntiCitizenOne said...

> increasing the minimum wage will case inflation

No, it will decrease employment. Think of the "minimum wage" as more the compulsory unemployment level.

Anonymous said...

Dickie @ 4:45 PM, April 23, 2008

Dickie, yours is one of probably millions of stories of people who have been and will increasingly be bled dry by these people.

Here's a thought - consider buying your van from the business so that it becomes your personal vehicle. At ten years old the amount you need to transfer should be minimal. Now make the business pay yourself the maximum per mile allowance the tax man permits for your own vehicle on business use. The payment should be tax deductable from the business. Do the sums. Only you know how much your business miles are, so you'll need to sit down with your calculator to work out if this is a benefit or not. Hope this helps.

Alex said...

It's all very well giving back money to the poor, but how is he going to pay for it. I reckon he needs to put an extra 2p on the basic rate of income tax to pay for it.

Anonymous said...

AntiCitizenOne said...increasing the minimum wage..will decrease employment.

I employ 6 part time ladies. One has just left. Since Mr Bean increased the rate in August and it is due to rise again anyway.. and now he's promising to increase it again!! The one who left has not ben replaced.. One more will HAVE to go if the rate keeps rising. Profits aren't rising and costs [fuel/rates/rents] are just out of control.]

This idiot! The last minimum wage rise, paid for by employers never even got to any of these 6 ladies due to idiot Bean as he abolished the 10p rate. All of ..all of us in my buisiness were worse off.. who gained? Only that total tosser Brown.

TomTom said...

So Brown grabs more tax by abolishing his 10p band introduced in 1999......rthen he boosts the Minimum Wage so employers can fork out more gross pay for the Under-25s.

This man seems determined to create a Slump

Anonymous said...

I thought it was rather naughty of the PM to have himself flanked by 2other Scottish MPs (Browne and Darling) ON ST. GEORGE'S DAY in the English Parliament. Rubbing it in doncha think?
By the way I'm Scottish, but I also hate the snot-gobbling......etc, etc.

ShropshireHillbilly said...

Just back from SarkosyLand to find this mess.
Just another reason for decent Labour MPs - there must be some - to finally bite the bullet and get rid of the man. He is an insult to our intellegence and an embarrassment to us all.
And just what is Frank Field up to? He has not received anything like the concrete results he was so stridently demanding, yet has rolled over to have his belly stroked by the snotgobbler. I thought there was a little more to him than that!

Anonymous said...

The fuck-wits who populate the Labour benches make you puke. Even after all the huffing and puffing, tales of doing this and of that, there will still be a huge number of very lowly paid people (those who earn less than £10000 a year) who will be robbed by this pathetic government.

So much for these fuck-wits and their 'principles'. God grant us a Tory Government soon.

Anonymous said...

Ha Ha! Did your see Gideon getting ripped a new one by Jon Snow? What a thick tory twat! NOBODY believes that the tories give a flying fuck for the poor. They opposed the minimum fucking wage fer chrisakes...

javelin said...

Gordon increased the 10% tax rate because he calculated that most of those effected were new migrants who weren't eligible to vote and those who gained were lower-middle class families from the key marginals.

He only acts to save his skin.

Anonymous said...

If Brown cared about the poor, he would have spared them the complication of his income tax and working family tax credit forms.

As for the mimimum wage it is a sop to the unions and a bureaucratic waste of time.

If it takes NuLab MPs so long to spot that Broon's last budget would cause them problems after the new tax year has started, it shows voters that their representatives are incapable of scrutinising a Finance Bill.

Broon passes the buck once again, trys to offer a solution to a problem of his own making, and inevitably fucks it up by setting additional complication and form filling. How many of the Nulab jellyfish wonder at their party's collective stupidity by allowing this sub-prime loser to become the sub-prime minister.

Next Thursday week, we will all be looking in vain for a NuLab Gain, all we will see is Lab loss, after loss after loss.

on the fiddle said...

Dickie the sheet metal worker:

Simple solution: do more cash in hand and keep shtum.

You really must learn from your masters.

Anonymous said...

I'm sure Dave almost called the Bottler a "pathetic cunt" in PMQ's today.

Quickly corrected himself and said "What a pathetic figure he cuts"

First is more accurate.

Anonymous said...

Mrs Balls seemed to have a hard time defending Snottie McTwat's U-turn on last night's Newsnight. Kept repeating herself as did her leader in PMQs. Looking for their marbles perhaps...

I guess she was considered the least likely to incurr Paxo's withering looks at her failure to answer even the simplest questions. The string pullers were wrong.

thick as thieves said...

on balance I think it could be said that project
'save gordon's backside' is going very badly indeed.
and has anyone seen blair's official portrait.
that is what a vampire looks like.

Brick shithouse said...

What was missing from the Cooper/ Paxman interview was the background music.

Try the Eagles "You can't hide those lyin' eyes"

"You can't hide your lyin' eyes
And your smile is a thin disguise
I thought by now you'd realize
There ain't no way to hide your lyin eyes
Honey, you can't hide your lyin' eyes"

getridofgordonnow said...

Cameron and Brown were both a bit tongue-tied during PMQs this week, although Cameron's mistake was probably a bit more deliberate...

If you listen to it you'll hear that DC started saying "Do you realised what a pathetic cu...." and then rephrased to "what a pathetic figure you cut"

Also if you re-listen to it you'll hear that GB started talking about erections instead of elections for some reason, but I don't think that was deliberate, it's just because he's a blithering twat.

I wanted to mention that on the bbc blog but I don't think they'd approve it, despite it being true.


Tip off Guido
Web Guido's Archives















Support the Open Rights Group

View blog authority
Categories