Rumours of CCHQ Recriminations
Guido is trying to get confirmation of senior Cameroonie quitting / threatening to quit. Wasn't this scripted for Cowley Street not Millbank?
UPDATED : George Bridges has quit according to unofficial but reliable sources.
UPDATED : George Bridges has quit according to unofficial but reliable sources.
34 comments:
Bridges has quit - fell out with Ashcroft (long standing feud) and Coulson.
I can confirm that Bridges has walked though this had been in the pipeline for a couple of weeks and has little to do with last nights Tory meltdown.
Eustice next?
Who's he?
A quick google reveals a Washington photographer, the president of a certain Whitman College, the organiser of the Greenwich jazz festival, a judge as well as an author of IT programming books etc.
Is Ben Brogan unofficial?
What a load of fuss about nothing:
Labour hold Southall and Sedgefield.
Of course, the media don't mention Brown's abysmal last performance at PMQs - Cameron destroyed him on early release of prisoners.
The Labour benches looked on in horror, it was a bit like watching a confused old bull being sliced up by a matador, but more fun.
As in Useless Eustace surely?
He was crap anyway
Who the hell is George Bridges? Cameron's fag?
DK
This weekend the Tory press will roast Cameron. Cameron is off to Rawanda on Monday, classic error, never leave the country, when there is the prospect of a 'coup'
Throw a sickie Dave, stay at home!
Who is this George Bridges cunt?
Fuck it I dont care.
What we all want to know is who is sharing a mud hut With Iain Dale?
I tell you what , If it was me and I caught him looking at my buttocks as I got ready for bed I would feed him to the Hyenas.
Shame it wasn't those cunts Cameron and Hilton, then there might be some chance of the Conservative Party returning to belief and principle based politics instead of spin and PR bullshit and so also returning to election winning form.
one etonian down.
brogan's bloody good isn't he, paul?
Eusice is Tapestry, n'est-ce pas?
George Who?
MP? or what is this character?
Its clear that CCHQ is deeply infiltrated by a labour mole of some kind.
There should be sweeps for bugs and all Staff given lie detector tests.
Too many coincidences on the down side, almost no surprises on the up side.
Oh and this Notting Hill clique can fuck off back over the rainbow.
Bridges? Who? ;-)
George who?
Completely off topic, but can we have a Cabinet Cannabis Counter, Mr Fawkes? After Jacqui, Alistair and Ruth, I'm afraid I've lost count of who's 'fessed up in the last few days. I vaguely recall Harriet Harman's admission this morning. A list would be interesting...
Who is Charles Elphicke? is it near Glasgow or Penzance
Ashcroft neede to sort out some of the PPCs who are not working hard enough and bringing in the results.
Brogan is good, too bloody good, but Guido didn't know he'd already run it when he heard.
FFS
WHEN will the Conservative party wake up to the FACT that call me Dave ain't a Conservative.
He's a Liberal FFS!!
Poor old Bridges....
Think we should set up a campaign now to save Eustice!
FYI.. Charles Elphicke is the Deputy Chairman of the Cities of London and Westminster Conservative and the...ummm.. now brother in-law of Tory MP Mark Field.
There should be sweeps for bugs and all Staff given lie detector tests.
Why?
They own the CPS so what good would it do, except cost the taxpayer more unecessary enquiry expenses to watch more Labour criminals escape justice?
It is without doubt a plot, rumour or conspiracy, so as usual this blog does what it says on the tin. But it's not clever and it's not funny. The only lesson to be garnered from Ealing is that immigrants won't vote for a 'Conservative' and Convervatives won't vote for an immigrant. When will the penny drop in Cameroonia?
Watching the television last evening I saw that bloke who looks like the late Michael Schumaker, who sadly burned to death when his Panzer crashed in Cracow suppressing a terrorist uprising, and I thought to myself this bloke -von Cameron, isn't it?- looks as uncomfortable as if he'd shit in his pants while meeting the Queen. Stood outside the site of his latest spectacular electoral defeat, he was kind of shuffling around shamefully as though great clinging masses of warm, smelly material adhered loosely and warmly to his buttocks and his genitals, stinging a little as tiny, hard bits wormed their way beneath his foreskin, shifting around like pungent continental plates, and were starting to slither inexorably down his trouser legs, shedding bits of themselves in creases and flaps of skin, to emerge reeking and steaming below his bicycle clips, disgorging themselves onto his shoes before sliding to the pavement, there, yellowy-brown and moist, for the planet's tv crews to capture.
I understand that in some parts of the Continent the sight of important persons covered in shit is almost commonplace and that, indeed, there are whole quadrants of cyberspace given over to the celebration of individuals spattered with, immersed in, even, I understand, eating their own, but especially others' excrement. And doing so with at least feigned relish; like the Archbishop of Canterbury pretending he believes in God. No, honest, I really do, I love this shit. Never having been invited to appear on Mr Stephen Fry's eccentric but determined televisual celebrations of anal, urological, copraphiliac and bestial preoccupations presented as erudition, I claim no expertise in this area; it distressed me nevertheless to be able to recognise, almost by instinct, that the Leader of Her Majesty's loyal Opposition had shit himself. Or shat; one would need a silverspoon shit-eating grammarian of Mr Fry's emeritus standing to provide a definitive participle. It may be that Mr Fry and his contestants routinely appear on television wearing nappies filled with fresh, steaming, mashed turds and the floor manager and camerapersons go about their business wearing ventilators whilst Mr Fry and his chums sit inhaling like mad, keepers of some foul olfactory secret; a Worshipful Brethren of the Lower Bowel, some diarhoaeic voodoo gathering, snidely mocking we license-payers sat at home with only the odd fart to remind us of God's exciting cornucopia of sexual stimulii.
No matter. The BBC is awash with horror and those with only a passing interest in abominable, unnatural acts should avoid it. Mr Fry's unstoppable degeneracy is in such contrast to his earlier, youthful and delightful characterisation of Professor Trefussis, that one would bet money on him being turned by the BBC into a homosexualist, or some other kind of pervert. That's what they do. look at Frank Bough.
Mr von Cameron, however, is a different kettle of faeces, one of which we had such high, not to say fragrant, hopes. And what does he do ? How does he repay our support ? He shits himself and stands there stuttering and pretending the wind is blowing in the right direction.
Analysing Mr von Cameron's misjudgements, one of his acolytes admitted later that, in prominently backing a spiv turncoat and staking his entire political credibility on the one by-election, he had made the wrong decision but - and I am not making this up, it was on Friday's NewsWark - it was a right wrong decision.
Globally humiliated, shit-dripping, would-be, prime minister makes right wrong decision. That'll move us up the polls.
In Downing Street, kneeling on a prayerstool, biting into a pleasant, green mucus canape and sipping from a glass of his own urine Prudence the prime minister muttered to himself: " Mmmm, pooh, eh? He disnae know who he's up against, the noo." "Sarah!" he bellowed, " fetch me doon ma armoured war nappy. There can be only one. And it is I. I, Prudence, I am the one,true King of Shit; Cry havoc, let slip the turds of war!"
Sometimes, as I mentioned elsewhere, I find the television quite unsettling but try to calm myself with visions of the home secretary in student orgies of reefer madness. Don't suppose anyone has any photos of same???
The Tory Party are a complete shower. Their only hope of actually being re-elected is sticking with Cameron and stop all this divisive arguing. If they think electing a right wing candidate as leader like David Davis will make them more electable they are living in a fantasy world. The electorate have seen the party led by several leaders from the right and they WONT elect them OR a right wing Tory Party. Unfortunately a large part of the party is still living in the past and dreaming about their past glories.
O/T The only laugh I've had in the last 48 hours is the picture on page 4 of Friday's "Telegraph" of Hazel Blears in her pot smoking student years. She looks a good 20 years older than she does now.
She is a walking advert for Botox.
Anonymong: 6:53am
I completely agree.
Labour are shit scared of Cameron. Brown does not want to face Cameron at the next GE. Cameron is going to find it very difficult without MSM support, even the so-called Tory papers, like the DT or Hate Mail, have a Brownite agenda. The BBC are desperate to get Brown elected and ITN and Sky also suffer from the general left-wing consensus that you get in broadcast news.
These two by-elections went the way nearly all, Labour party, very safe seat by-elections go. The Labour Party holds the seat with a reduced share of the vote, the 3rd place Tories increase a bit and the Lib-Dems get the protest vote so increase more than anyone else and over-all there is very low turnout.
Whoever thought it was a good idea for Cameron to make a big deal of Ealing, giving the historical position there, should get fired!
The anti-Cameron media were desperate to make these by-elections a referendum on Cameron, and he gave them a big stick to beat him with the ridiculously optimistic Ealing campaign. The Tony Lit fiasco just made it more embarrassing. A comparison would be, if there was a by-election in a constituency like Amersham and Chesham and Labour claiming they could win it to show how much the white middle-classes like Labour. It would be lunacy!
The Conservatives actually increased their share of the vote, slightly, in both by-elections, and Labour had a significant contraction (hardly good news for a "Honeymoon" Prime Minister) The Tories should have played a much lower key game and conceded that they stood no chance in the safest of Labour safe seats, instead of trying to prove that ethnic minorities want ot vote for them.
They could have pointed to the fall in Labour share as a sign the Broon's honeymoon was over, and the Lib Dems just got the usual protest vote boost, but less then it usually is for them. Instead the media a slagging-off Cameron for a result that was always pre-determined.
Cameron should stop chasing lost-causes and needlessly winding-up the grass-roots.
"These two by-elections went the way nearly all, Labour party, very safe seat by-elections go."
except that Labour were winning Tory held seats with smiliar majorities in by elections from 1990 onwards.The fact that the Tories are making no impact in parliamentry by elections 10 years into a Labour government should be setting alarm bells ringing somewhere.I hope all Tories are this complacent.As for facing 'Cameron's Conservatives' at a general election-bring it on :-)
Anonymong 11.52 am
That is bollocks. Labour where not winning by-elections from the Tories, from 3rd place, in equivalent safe Conservative seats. The protest vote for Fib-dems was doing them more damage.
Like I said sonny, do you think Labour could have come to South Bucks and got a result? Not a chance. The Tories had to contend with blatant bias from the BBC before every by-election, like they do now as well. It was always fashionable to vote agaisnt the Conservatives in by-elections or because Tory voters were at work and don't have the time or inclination to vote in by-elections.
The only major party to see a contraction in their share of the vote in these by-elections was Labour, despite the Brownite honeymoon propaganda in the MSM. He couldn't even keep Labour level of support level in heartland constituencies.
George Bridges was about the only only senior Tory operative with any manners.
Dysfunctional cunts like Hilton and Kate Fall just have to go. If you want to be arrogant stuck-up fucks, by God, you'd better exceed the hype and they so don't.
Charlotte Corday said...
O/T The only laugh I've had in the last 48 hours is the picture on page 4 of Friday's "Telegraph" of Hazel Blears in her pot smoking student years. She looks a good 20 years older than she does now.
She is a walking advert for Botox.
I think all our Hazel did was stand around with a tray on her head while her fellow students used her as a mobile ashtray ...
Post a Comment