WebCameron Co-conspirators Want Answers
This could be a Miliband-Wiki type debacle for another online politician not playing it straight with the net-roots. Already the most voted for question on WebCameron's "Ask Dave" this week is the same one he shamelessly dodged last week. Where do the millions come from? Who is behind the offshore funding fronts? Don't try to fob us off with an "I'm a transparent kinda guy" answer this time.
72 comments:
DC's right - he is a fairly transparent kind of guy. It's clear that he's no different from the other cheating lying lot and guido, like it or not, your role is to expose all these swines for what they are. You must not create the impression that one of the gangs masquerading as political parties is any better than the other. Especially as ten years in useless opposition may have led to some people forgetting how rotten Dave’s lot were all those years ago.
I'm on Dave's side - "Don't let the bastards get you down!"
he he he
The ten years 'useless opposition' was because of their de-branding (see my blog) by the BBC and other Leftward controlled tendrils.Also www.guardianlies.com has an interesting take on that.There aren't any winners that Labour can call on so you're wasting sweat perhaps 2 years early.
At election time,a man thinks to himself: 'Just once I'd like to see a politician in a stressfull situation having the guts to tell the truth.' His wish is granted.In a vision he sees a tied up Blair confessing to his dominatrix:'I've been a bad,bad boy.'
Please consider voting for my question entitled "rule out state funding of political parties". Thank you.
The anonymong Nu Labour trolls are back with their last desperate throw of the dice, ie: "OK we're bent and sleazy but Cameron's just as bad!!"
Anyone who falls for that Mandelson/Campbell inspired shite is soft in the head.
What do you want? Five years of Brown after the next general election?
Think about it!
Anonymous 4.44pm is right - this could NOT be a Miliband-Wiki type debacle for another online politician not playing it straight with the net-roots.
Already the most voted for question on WebCameron's "Ask Dave" this week is NOT the same one he shamelessly dodged last week.
This is supposed to be a Conservative site. I don't understand why you're printing NuLab lies.
"This is supposed to be a Conservative site."
It is? Sorry, they're too wishy-washy and useless. I'm a UKIP supporter these days.
Spoiler note - this NOT a NuLab post. I've voted Tory in all general elections since 1979.
Can Dave tell us why on earth he agreed to be sponsored by Tamares Real Estate, the US Las Vegas casino owners/developers, and the third largest landowners in LV? I mean, there must be a reason, and if it's an innocent one he can explain it, surely? If it isn't innocent, it'll come out sooner or later.
See the H of C Register of Interests
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmregmem/051214/memi06.htm
AND
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamares_Real_Estate_Investments
also the Tamares Group website
http://www.tamares.com/
Well? We're all ears, Dave.
No, anon 4.44 is YOU John Bull. Pathetic CCHQ twat.
allan said...
No, anon 4.44 is YOU John Bull. Pathetic CCHQ twat.
Anon 4.44 here and I'm not John Bull, you shit-stirring NuLab turd.
Mr Bull
This isn't a Conservative site.
It is just a place where like minded individuals who fucking hate politicians of all hues congregate and laugh at their lies and sexual perversions.
Merry Christmas you tedious cunt.
'What do you want? Five years of Brown after the next general election?
Think about it!'
And we think about three years of Brown before the next general election - and are even more appalled .
Annonymouse 4:29: "DC's right - he is a fairly transparent kind of guy."
He's doing what he thinks he has to do to gain power - that's all - nothing more nor less; and principles simply don't figure in the matter, other than as 'how best to use them to the required end'. Amusing - and sick isn't it?
It's what happens when your electorate are predominantly gullible, shallow, ignorant, self-centred, self-righteous, deluded, welfare junkies - that take it for granted that British foreign policy is 'enlightened, benign, for the good of the world, etc but where a British life is oh-so-obviously worth several tens of thousands of Iraqi lives isn't it?' - for example.
The present lot won't be ousted with honesty; they'll be ousted by similar shysters playing a similar filthy shitty game better - for a while.
So the REAL question is which shysters would you prefer?
My judgement is that the late Mr Fawkes' historic proposal had merit.
Well said |Mr. Hitchens Sir, 5.49...........and a Merry Christmas to ALL tedious cunts and to the rest of us.
Peace on Earth and Goodwill to all......at least until after the Holidays........
Looks like you've lost your place on the A-list Guido
Anonymous 5.02 said...
"This is supposed to be a Conservative site."
I think you've missed the ferking point why not fuck off to some tame ferking site.
Maybe it was actually a statement of HBT rights that "Call me Dave" was making. Maybe he said: "I believe trans-parents, see?". The other alternative being that he's a lying shitbag.
The internet means that information and opinion are flowing freely outside the old controlled channels. This is a very bad thing for the criminal conspiracy known as mainstream politics, which runs the West for the benefit of one group in particular -- 'Lord' Levy is one of their shining ornaments. Shameron has pretended he welcomes the new 'openness' and 'accessibility' of the internet, but the truth is that he cannot do his job properly when he can be held to account like this. Free speech and free debate are not good for liars, crooks and traitors. Accordingly, the criminal conspiracy will try to end internet freedom as soon as possible. It will use the same excuse as it used to end freedom in the older media: the need to fight 'hatred'. After all, liars, crooks and traitors hate being exposed.
http://shurl.org/PGVwr
Politics is a branch of organised crime - Putin knows that - our politicos simply cannot face up to the fact
bagelsforbenji said...
http://shurl.org/PGVwr
On 13 October 2006, The Jewish Chronicle published the article, Team Cameron’s Big Jewish Backers.
This is it:
"Prominent members of the Jewish community are playing a major role in financing David Cameron’s bid for power, a JC investigation can reveal........
Confirmation, if any were needed, that the Tories are going to win the next election. Get your money on quick, it's a dead cert!
bagelsforbenji,
gosh - I thought it was all those shouts of "you in the back row keep up" and we did, instead of just having a laugh, and wondering at the keenies in the front desks, and things beginning to get out of proportion and anoraks thinking they counted and all.
But no! We are going to meet them at the bottom of the drive at quarter to four? That'll be more satisfactory than all this writing and looking things up.
Blogfan said...
Anonymous 5.02 said...
"This is supposed to be a Conservative site."
Err, no I didn't.
Blogfan said...
I think you've missed the ferking point why not fuck off to some tame ferking site.
I'll have a pint of whatever you've been drinking, tosser.
Anon 5.02
Forget the futile ideological debates - the truth is politicians have only one interest, the interest in preserving their grip on 'power'. By power I mean the right to try and set the mood music for the country, whilst the vast majority get on with their business irrespective of what happens in the Westminster world of reality tv for the learned segments of the population. In such a situation surely Blair (PBUH) has led the way in taking money from as many 'special' interests as possible to the degree that none of them can truely be regarded as special in any other sense than contributing to maintaining the status quo. Cameron will take money from the same people should he look likely to win but the truth is it will make fuck all difference anyway.
Anon. 9:17 said "the truth is politicians have only one interest, the interest in preserving their grip on 'power'."
This is cynical but true. Remember John Gummer feeding a vile hamburger to his own daughter to quell the BSE scare? Cecil Parkinson disowning his natural daughter? That other Tory creep (can't even recall the bastard's name; he used to dress up in Chelsea football kit while humping his Spanish mistress; I think he's on Radio 5 now as some sort of footy guru) posing with his whole family, using them as props, to try and keep a lid on the scandal?
Loathsome. That's what they are. They'd sell their own grannies into prostitution if that meant winning, or staying in, office. I'm sure there's some genetic or psychological defect which causes people to go into politics. They like telling others what to think and what to do -- how pathetic is that?
All power to Guido for exposing the sanctimonious slimeballs. They're all the same, Tory or Labour, Green or UKIP, BNP or Communist.
Got that off my chest, then.
Fuller
Anybody who has ever visited the village of scotton Pinkey knows what a degenerate you are.
Pot kettle !
And you still owe me £30,000
The Hitch
There's no problem with all the politicians being as bent as a spine following a visit from our axe murdering friend as long as the public is cured of the sancitmonious disease amongst the public that expects them all to be whiter than white. In the past we've needed history to show us what a bunch of perverted crooks govern us. Now we have fuckers like Guido (in the nicest possible sense) showing us in real time. Two options: first, we could accept it and get on with consuming the spectacle of westminster bollocks fully aware that everyone is in the pay of someone, somewhere, including the politicians. Or we demand real and definite change to the way we currently and always have done politics. That will require major reforms and a shifting of the debate onto real issues that accept the shiteness of the current situation. That to mean sounds like far too much effort so lets just continue lynch mob campaigns to expose as many of them as possible, no matter what side of the house they sit.
nb. don't drink and post. Anonymouse
You can say what you like.
Blair and Brown's New Labour are the biggest bunch of two-faced, lying, traitorous, sleaziest, bent bastards this country's ever had the misfortune of running it and all because 22% of the thickest, slimiest bunch of pricks amongst the electorate voted for them.
The Tories, LibDems, BNP, UKIP, and the rest don't come within a hundred miles of this lot who have trashed and ransacked the country and intend to continue doing so for as long as they can get away with it.
But who gives a shit so long as you lot you can wallow in smug, holier-than-thou, self-indulgence.
Hitchens: Kindly retract that allegation (about the £30K I mean). Your cousin "repossessed" my Cayenne and we are more than quits. BTW where is the money you promised for the Scotton Pinkney Xmas bash?
All: Did you know Peter won the lottery the other week? He financed a sex-change for his Uncle Bernhard, but has plenty over, so get your begging letters in now!
Sorry anon 5.o2, yes that comment was from further up - I wouldn't have a pint of what I drink, but anyway Merry Xmas
anon 10.20
evidentially sound and a reasonable conclusion.
Story going the rounds
Police shootout in Wales with Al Kieda mob, dogs sent in
D notice on Press
any one heard it?
is there a punch line coming?
Anonymous said...
Story going the rounds
Police shootout in Wales with Al Kieda mob, dogs sent in
D notice on Press
any one heard it?
DON'T mention the m*slims. I did it once and it was deleted.
I think Guido's scared of getting the Salman Rushdie style fatwa treatment.
No, story is it happened 4 days ago with NON CHRISTIANS, somewhere in Wales
somewhere in deepest Wales
D notice on Press
What happened?
in deepest Whales
you get this from Jonah?
I just heard it was a shoot out, but a blanket D notice was put on the Press
thats all
perhaps it never happened............
Your Honour
Whaleshit
There was a slight mention about a fracas in Wales on BBC 24.... Maybe it's got something to do with this rather alarmist report
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/femail/article.html?in_article_id=424267&in_page_id=1879
There is now a "D" Notice in effect on this blog.
There is now a "D" Notice in effect on this blog.
There is now a "E" Notice in effect on this blog. (it's even worse than we thought.)
Anon 1:02 am
Dunno what that has to do with gun battles in Wales. Or Cameron's increasing similarity to Blair. Nice picture though.
So long as it isn't the result of some Photoshopping methinks Ms Lloyd will be climbing in the MILF Charts this Christmas.
I'm all for Comrade Dave being a "transparent kind of guy", I can see right through people like that anyway.
Regarding some of the above comments can I remind people of the traditional Christmas police message to bloggers ...
Don't Drink and Drivel.
Well done Guido.
PS merry xmas everyone:
http://news.independent.co.uk/business/news/article2094696.ece
Incomes squeezed by record tax burden
"The tax burden on households has risen to its highest since modern records began while growth in incomes has slowed sharply, according to official figures yesterday that will put a chill through retailers' hearts.
Taxes on incomes now take out almost a quarter - 23.6 per cent - of wages and salaries, according to the detailed national accounts for the third quarter of the year."
Philip Thornton Independent
Merry Christmas...you can all go home now....
And Merry Xmas from Gay Gordon the rockin horse ridin, nappy wearin, stagflation man...
Living costs outpace earnings
22/12/2006
Cash-strapped households are having to dig into their savings as the pressure of higher bills, higher taxes and lower wage growth slashes the amount of money left in their pockets, authoritative figures show. Statistics released by the Government have revealed the amount Britons are saving has fallen for a third successive month while the sums paid in income taxes have jumped by the fastest rate in eight years....
Meanwhile a survey from Lloyds TSB showed business confidence in the economy has plunged amid fears of a housing market crash. The research showed one in three of the 200 firms questioned were more pessimistic in the past three months.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2006/12/22/cnecon22.xml
Gordon Brown voted Miserabilist of the year:
http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/2528/
"He is a man for our times, encapsulating the narrow-minded, illiberal, pious politics of low expectations that is so widespread today. You can put as many pink neckties under his frowning gob as you like, but it won’t make much difference. It is the political climate that needs shaking up, not Brown’s fashion sense."
"All those who think Brown, the Old Labourite, will make radical changes to New Labour’s Britain are in for a shock. In fact he will have a stultifying effect on debates and arguments for progress. Brown is now the face and voice of New Labour, representing its inherent values of austerity, interventionism and security-over-freedom better than anybody else. He is a more than deserving winner of the Miserabilist of the Year Award; and next year we can look forward to him going one better and becoming the Prime Miserabilist of Britain."
Spiked Online
Cannot log in to WebCameron - it keeps primising a password but it never comes ... boo hoo ... [sobs] ...
isn't this "NuLab" monicker a bit sad? It's the kind of thing people who spend their weekends at Star Trek conventions would say.
We're up to 90 votes now. Get voting, don't let DC get away with his shitty politicians tactics, and lets beat the pathetic tally of 97 votes that we got the last time.
Captain Picard said...
isn't this "NuLab" monicker a bit sad? It's the kind of thing people who spend their weekends at Star Trek conventions would say.
Where do you spend *your* weekends?
NuLab meetings?
Off-topic: The Wales 'Al-Qaida' thing is a load of tosh:
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&ie=UTF-8&ncl=1112140072
"isn't this "NuLab" monicker a bit sad?"
Yes, I prefer "Zanu Lab".
I've signed up and voted.
well assorted fluffs, off for Christmas now...thank you for adding a little more variety, pleasure, anger and hope to my daily chores....Happy Christmas everyone....and Gudio...the well know human being..(ish)....
Mr Fuller@1204
Yes, it does give a more accurate image of mr blairs little project.
Mr Groan@1204
Me to. Also voted for "no state funding" while I was there.
Albert Ardvark you seem to missing an A and Mr Fuller you must get to SpecSavers soonest. You are not a member of the real ZANU, I trust.
dr crackers
you seem to missing a "b"
yours
a ardvark
ard vark
fuchsia @12.04 is clearly a femine suedonym.
oops mising more lettters.
xmas to you all.
Mr A Ardvark the only thing missing is part of my brain. Self diagnosis puts it down to periods spent in equatorial Africa without quinine.
Yours
Crackers Dr (Ret)
Merry Xmas to patients of this blog. Mr H - Lots of water with everything. Do not eat liver under any circs.
Dear Mr Fuller,
I voted for Miss Cottle, and she is odds on to get another vote as soon as I get round this bl**dy table.
Lt.Col. Scroble - Ne
Yes, bring down Dave, so we can have another 10 years of glorious NuLab rule!!
Its like Turkeys voting for Christmas here.
adama
To er.
"peter hitchins" Haven't you got a criminal record for sexual pervsions with a minor?
Well I've voted for yours Guido. How about voting for mine asking Dave/id what he is doing about enticing Lib Dems to cross the floor and what this will do for his selection policy and the "eh?" list. As in "eh, you'll never guess who's appeared on there now!". And whether he likes the fact that Lib Dem members polled recently said they'd prefer the Tories to have the box seat. Confirming their "left wing" credentials. I know other polls of Lib Dem voters have said different. But that's just it isn't it? The LD voters are a right royal coalition of all-over-the-place tacticals, peaceniks, tories, socialists, social conservatives, libertarians. Whereas a majority of the members prefer to be in a Lib Con pact.
Guido. How about voting for mine asking Dave/id what he is doing about enticing Lib Dems to cross the floor
I want him to entice Shaun Woodward back to his old seat in Witney
voyager: "I want him to entice Shaun Woodward back to his old seat in Witney."
Now, Voyager: Surely Sean wouldn't be unable to unseat the sitting NuNu Lab MP for Witney? Sean just doesn't have the left-wing green-behind-the-ears credentials to win against Dave SmartSpart.
'Don't let's ask for the moon...'
Back to Basics.
9.21pm
sorry, typo: I meant to write -
"Surely Sean would be unable to unseat the sitting NuNu Lab MP for Witney?"
Post a Comment