Advertise on this site

Monday, March 27, 2006

Levy Asked for Credit Knowing Refusal Often Offends

Seems to Guido that the wrong questions are being asked, Prescott in all likelihood did not know about the loans to the property developers. Lord Levy on the other hand mixes in the same social circles as Sir David Garrard and Andrew Rosenfeld, the property millionaires behind Minerva.

Sleazy Levy would know that they were risking millions on getting government approval, they would therefore be vulnerable to an approach from the Labour party's fundraiser - well, if you have a £600 million property development resting on government approval what is a £3 million "loan"? It represents less than 1/2% of the development cost.

Capita with billions in government contracts would also be vulnerable, we all know you "do not to ask for credit because refusal often offends". What businessman would want to offend their biggest customer, even if as Labour claims it was unlikely to make any real difference, would you as CEO want to risk offending the source of more than half your revenues? Rod Aldridge didn't approach Labour with an offer to help, they approached him - "The Labour Party came to me last year in need of financial support following the costs incurred at the last general election", he said.

Businessman are cynical about politicians, most would view such an approach as a shakedown, but what real choice would they have?
Zopa

4 comments:

Rigger Mortice said...

none!

Nulabour said...

Does anyone know how many of the other 11 lenders were "shaken down" for a loan after the General Election ?

Surely the implied threat to a businessman's current or future Government contracts or planning permissions etc. would have been much stronger after the Election, than during the run up to it, when there was a chance that Labour might not win ?

Guido Fawkes Esq. said...

Aldridge got his shakedown in October 2005.

Rick said...

Many years ago when Frank MacFadzean ran Shell he was interviewed about the corruption scandals Shell Italia was embroiled in.

He responded that Shell had huge investments in Italy and a long established business; and when politicians or their agents came to shake you down for cash it was hard to say no if you did not want to see your business subjected to political and executive agency displeasure...............in other words.........protection rackets


Tip off Guido
Web Guido's Archives

Categories
Archives
Guido Reads