Advertise on this site

Tuesday, December 20, 2005

Think-Tankers on the Take

Wonk for Sale : The Times has an article that will seem familiar to this blog's readers and will make a few wonks in London nervous. As the fall-out from the Doug Bandow scandal in Washington spreads - London based wonks who have taken cash to write press releases in the form of pamphlets will be keeping a low profile. Its pretty easy to work out who has been on the take, basically any think-tank that publishes favourable research which furthers the interests of any heavily regulated business will almost certainly have benefitted from corporate largesse.

The pharmaceutical industry in particular spends heavily to ensure that politicians keep the profits flowing from the taxpayers to the bottom line. An amazing number of think-tanks across the political spectrum have an interest in pharma-related issues and they all say the same things. Its like one big echo chamber.

The other suspect practise favoured by those think-tanks close to the government is cash-for-access, IPPR was a master of this wheeze. Never as crude as "give us a donation and we will introduce you to the minister", but effectively that was the implicit deal offered. IPPR boasts of its "strong networks in government" and the flow of wonks to the civil service as special advisers (who later become well paid lobbyists) keeps the corporate cheques coming. IPPR has "partners" not clients. The IPPR pitch is careful, but clear: "partners have regular contact with our research directors to discuss the progress of projects relevant to their sector. Partners have the opportunity to get on the inside track of policy development." You bet they do.

11 comments:

Andrew said...

Familiar writing style as well, eh, 'Guido'? ;)

Tim Worstall said...

Can someone tell me where I sign up to sell my soul in this manner?

Wat Tyler said...

Nu Lab's fave tank eh, Guido?

I once spent an afternoon in the Charity Commission trying to unravel their finances. (Yes, I realise I should get out more)

Anyway, it proved to be frustratingly difficult because iirc various money-spinners had been spun off into research subs.

But I now see I was barking up the wrong tree completely. I only wish I your suspicious conspiratorial mind.

Well done G. I'll have to have a proper gander at those "partners".

(Btw, I'm assuming 5 Nov's wonktonk funding doesn't come from a gunpowder manufacturer)

Wat Tyler said...

And I know you've checked out Dr Crippen on medicos who take the Pharma Shilling (see http://nhsblogdoc.blogspot.com/2005/12/mrs-crippens-vagina.html )

Sorry, that should have read "the Pharma Fifty Grand".

stalin's gran said...

I'd have a word with this Paul Staines guy; do point out to him that stylistic and textual analysis shows he is shamelessly plagiarising your style. It is, frankly, an outrage.

Guido Fawkes Esq. said...

The lawyers will look into it.

Bruschetta Boy said...

I would have thought that Dr Frank Furedi and the cluster of "Sense About Science"/"Institute for Ideas"/ "I Can't Believe It's Not The Revolutionary Communist Party" thinktanks would be in the sights for this, albeit that they've been so blatant about it in the past that they might be ignored on the basis that nobody (except apparently Dick Taverne) has ever mistaken their work for genuine research.

Julian Morris said...

Let's make no mistake: what Doug Bandow did was wrong and Cato was right to ask him to resign.

But Staines allegation that IPN has been acting in a similar manner is defamatory nonsense, as I explain here:

http://www.policynetwork.net/main/article.php?article_id=719

Astro Turfer said...

So you will sue?

I mean its not like IPN or you took money from oil companies and then campaigned against Kyoto or said global warming was a "European myth"?

Or got cash from Merck and Pfizer and campaigned to ratchet up IP laws at the expense of the sick and the poor in the third world?

You wouldn't have pissed on free open source code and got support from software companies?

So what about this interview:

"Interviewer: Julian Morris, you believe the idea of global warming to be something of a myth. Why?

Julian Morris: There are basically 3 groups that benefit from the global warming myth: government, scientists and environmentalists. Environmentalists benefit because they are able to present a scary scenario to the general public, and because of their desire to maintain revenues scary scenarios are good business for them, it means the general public are more likely to give them money."

You didn't benefit from Exxon's oil money did you?

Anonymous said...

Hi, Thank you for having this info on the web. I enjoyed your post. If you may have any interest in
debt consolidation
then I know where you may get your solution. For your comfort, I have enclosed the link, so if needed you can visit the site. Thanks again for your lovely blog. credit

Anonymous said...

Everybody is for sale these days.

financial help, consolidation bills and consumer debt rss feed


Tip off Guido
Web Guido's Archives

Categories
Archives
Guido Reads